14:01:00 <graced> #startmeeting Evergreen Oversight Board Meeting, February 18, 2016 14:01:00 <pinesol_green> Meeting started Thu Feb 18 14:01:00 2016 US/Eastern. The chair is graced. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:01:00 <pinesol_green> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:01:00 <pinesol_green> The meeting name has been set to 'evergreen_oversight_board_meeting__february_18__2016' 14:01:13 <graced> #link Agenda http://wiki.evergreen-ils.org/doku.php?id=governance:minutes:2016-2-18 14:01:25 <graced> #topic Introductions 14:01:36 <graced> EOB members, please introduce yourself with #info 14:01:38 <csharp> #info csharp is Chris Sharp, GPLS 14:01:42 <graced> #info graced is Grace Dunbar, Equinox 14:01:53 <tspindler> #info tspindler is Tim Spindler, C/W MARS 14:01:56 <SHerbertBC> #info SHerbertBC is Sharon Herbert, Sitka/BC Libraries Co-op 14:01:57 <afterl> #info afterl is Amy Terlaga, Bibliomation 14:01:57 <montgoc1> info montgoc1 is Chauncey Montgomery, Consortium of Ohio Libraries 14:02:01 <rfrasur> #info rfrasur is Ruth Frasur, Hagerstown Library, Evergreen Indiana 14:02:01 <Tanyap> #info tanyap is Tanya Prokrym, NC Cardinal 14:02:21 <graced> We have a quorum (Andrea and Yamil were going to be late). 14:02:21 <graced> And we have a full agenda to get through, so let’s get started! 14:02:26 <abneiman> #info abneiman = Andrea Buntz Neiman, Kent County Public Library 14:02:42 <graced> I spoke too soon! 14:02:51 * graced waves at abneiman 14:02:51 <gmcharlt> #info gmcharlt = Galen Charlton, ESI, release manager and observer 14:03:02 <graced> #topic Minutes/Actions from last meeting 14:03:09 <abneiman> Maybe not, I may have to dive out at a moments notice :) 14:03:11 <graced> #link http://evergreen-ils.org/meetings/evergreen/2016/evergreen.2016-01-21-14.00.html 14:03:23 <graced> Any amendments to the minutes from the last meeting? 14:03:43 <rfrasur> Nope, not from me. 14:03:50 <tspindler> None 14:03:53 <graced> Any objections to approving the minutes from the last meeting? 14:04:12 <rfrasur> +1 to approving the minutes from the last meeting 14:04:12 * graced waits 60 seconds 14:04:19 <abneiman> no on both counts 14:04:38 <graced> seeing no onjections 14:04:39 <graced> #agreed Minutes from the 1/21/14 EOB meeting are approved. 14:04:46 <graced> *objections I should say 14:04:54 <tspindler> none 14:04:57 <graced> Okay, there are a few pending actions from the last meeting. 14:05:08 <graced> #info As I understand it, even though Chris has emailed several requests, we still haven’t heard back from the SFC on getting access to the financial reports 14:05:17 <graced> csharp: anything new on this? 14:06:18 <afterl> graced: Minor thing. You have wrong date on the minutes from 1/21/16 14:06:43 <rfrasur> Ah yeah...not 2014 14:06:44 <graced> afterl: thanks! Will update 14:07:43 <csharp> graced: no news, no 14:07:47 <rfrasur> afterl: that was just in IRC though, correct? It looks like the actual minutes are correct. Am I seeing that wrong? 14:07:58 <csharp> graced: I'll ping Karen in IRC if I don't hear back by tomorrow 14:07:59 <afterl> right 14:08:12 <afterl> rfrasur: right on the date question 14:08:17 <rfrasur> ;) 14:08:41 <graced> csharp: okay, thanks for your continued persistence 14:08:49 <rfrasur> I also have a point of clarification about the financials at this point. Does anyone in the Evergreen have access to the ledger? 14:09:00 <rfrasur> -the 14:09:06 <montgoc1> good question. 14:09:11 <csharp> rfrasur: we're trying to get yboston and gmcharlt access 14:09:24 <rfrasur> Right...but at this exact moment, no one has access? 14:09:26 <tspindler> is bshum the only one still? 14:09:31 <csharp> tspindler: yes 14:09:37 <rfrasur> okay 14:09:48 <csharp> tspindler: or was - we told the SFC about the leadership change 14:10:00 <tspindler> oy vay 14:10:14 <csharp> please don't fret - we'll get it fixed 14:10:14 <graced> hopefully we'll hear something back from them this week. 14:10:27 * rfrasur isn't fretting. 14:10:28 <graced> It's a busy time for them with our conference 14:10:45 <graced> any more questions/comments on that? 14:11:03 <graced> moving on then 14:11:05 <graced> I sent an email regarding the 10% conference budget approval interpretation 14:11:06 <rfrasur> Not the moment :-) 14:11:13 <graced> #link http://list.evergreen-ils.org/pipermail/eg-oversight-board/2016-February/001208.html 14:11:22 <graced> The gist is that the interpretation is that “expense” is a major line item (GL Code). So, any 10% increase to a given GL code for the budget would need to be approved by the Board. Also, any 10% decreases to expected/projected overall revenue generation would need to be approved. 14:11:29 <graced> Is there any further discussion on this interpretation? 14:11:59 <tspindler> makes sense to me 14:12:08 <afterl> I agree with what you propose 14:12:08 <abneiman> +1 to that interpretation 14:12:14 <montgoc1> +1 14:12:18 <tspindler> +1 14:12:19 <afterl> +1 14:12:23 <graced> The next logical step is to make this more clear to the conference committees and to institute some more specificity into the infrastructure. csharp and I have been chatting about this and we feel it’s worth pursuing. 14:12:53 <graced> Does anyone else have a hankering to assist in the process? 14:12:53 <afterl> Yes, that would be helpful 14:13:06 <montgoc1> Sure. 14:13:17 <afterl> Did I just accidentallly volunteer? 14:13:20 <rfrasur> I believe there was discussion about coming up with a standard categories. I +1 the interpretation. With the standard categories, would it a possibility to refer to them as expense categories rather than expenses? 14:13:28 <tspindler> I can 14:13:47 <tspindler> I can assist with this project if that wasn't clear 14:13:54 <graced> rfrasur: I'm waiting to hear back from the SFC as to their preferences 14:14:08 <rfrasur> graced: of course 14:14:08 <graced> I'm hoping to align the terminology 14:14:10 <afterl> I can assist too, however I can help, I will. 14:14:24 <graced> But, yes, expense categories makes sense 14:14:49 <graced> #action csharp, graced, montgoc1, tspindler, and afterl will continue pulling together information and guidelines to provide more structure to the conference process. 14:15:18 <graced> thanks, volunteers! 14:15:21 <csharp> graced: you suggested a shared Google doc - does that work for everyone as a starting place? 14:15:29 <tspindler> yes 14:15:33 <montgoc1> Yes 14:15:37 <afterl> Yes 14:15:43 <csharp> ok cool 14:16:04 <graced> moving on 14:16:05 <graced> #info Conference refund policy 14:16:12 <graced> I have requested and received information on this from previous conferences but haven’t had a chance to pull it together. I would like to defer this item to an email discussion. Any objections? 14:16:27 <afterl> Not from me 14:16:34 <tspindler> agreed 14:16:38 <rfrasur> Sounds good to me. 14:16:57 <graced> #action graced will send a summary of the conference refund policy info to the EOB list prior to the next meeting 14:17:07 <graced> Okay. Any other action items or old business? 14:17:41 <graced> #topic New Business 14:18:02 <graced> I think we can skip the Financial Report since we covered everything we can say about it at this point. Unless yboston has something to add? 14:18:42 <graced> yboston: we already discussed the fact that we don't yet have access... 14:18:53 <yboston_> I don't have anything to add, and I will be jumping in and out 14:19:11 <graced> okay 14:19:12 <graced> #topic 2.10 Release Manager’s Report 14:19:19 <yboston_> my presentation was pushed back, I am stuck on using a tablet 14:19:19 <graced> gmcharlt: you have the floor 14:19:43 <gmcharlt> #info Feature slush for release 2.10 is tomorrow, 19 February 2016 14:20:37 <gmcharlt> #info feature freeze is on the 26th, after which I'll publish a list of expected new features for the 2.10 release 14:20:52 <graced> ah, you anticipated my question! 14:21:04 <gmcharlt> #info at this point, final release is still expected on 17 March as scheduled 14:21:17 <rfrasur> gmcharlt++ 14:21:19 <graced> gmcharlt++ 14:21:33 <tspindler> gmcharlt++ 14:21:36 <montgoc1> gmcharlt++ 14:21:39 <afterl> gmcharlt+ 14:21:43 <graced> anything else gmcharlt? 14:21:46 <SHerbertBC> gmcharlt++ 14:21:54 <afterl> gmcharlt+++ 14:22:02 <csharp> gmcharlt++ 14:22:04 <gmcharlt> graced: no, I'm done 14:22:08 <graced> thanks! 14:22:15 <abneiman> gmcharlt++ 14:22:31 <graced> #topic Evergreen Conference 14:22:32 <graced> Does anyone have questions for tanyap? 14:22:35 <SHerbertBC> graced: agenda mentions update on v 3.0; was that actually referring to 2.10? 14:22:48 <gmcharlt> yep 14:22:52 <graced> SHerbertBC: yes 14:22:53 <gmcharlt> copy and paste is not my friend 14:23:07 <graced> what he said ^^ 14:23:33 <SHerbertBC> thx, was getting all excited 14:23:38 <graced> :) 14:23:59 <graced> Okay, if there are no questions for tanyap, perhaps she can give a quick update? 14:24:00 <Tanyap> today's update is that difference between estimated and actual receivables is down to $5675. 14:24:14 <graced> that's good news! 14:24:45 <abneiman> gotta jump off, may be back 14:24:54 <graced> Tanyap: how many registrations do you currently have? 14:25:02 <csharp> we have between 14 and 15 registrations from GPLS coming soon, FYI :-) 14:25:05 <Tanyap> we have 158 paid attendees and 19 non-paying (vendors/exhibitors); headcount = 177 14:25:33 <rfrasur> The Evergreen Indiana consortium just approved scholarships for up to 4 individuals not including ISL attendees, so there will be a few more there as well. 14:25:44 <Tanyap> csharp: yeah! we should meet our difference gap then. 14:25:45 <graced> That's a good amount for 60 days out, believe it or not 14:25:56 * csharp agrees with graced 14:25:58 <afterl> Yes, I agree 14:26:05 <rfrasur> yep yep 14:26:23 <afterl> Nice work! 14:26:38 <tspindler> Tanyap++ 14:26:41 <SHerbertBC> tanyap++ 14:26:50 <JBoyer> rfrasur: That they not work here wasn't a stipulation that I recall, just that Anna and I aren't applying. (sry to butt in, everyone) 14:26:53 <rfrasur> tanyap++ #great job :D 14:27:03 <montgoc1> Tanyap++ 14:27:12 <rfrasur> jboyer: right 14:27:27 <JBoyer> Good. Because someone that works here is applying. :D 14:27:34 <graced> Tanyap: Anything we can do for you / answer for you today? 14:27:53 <rfrasur> ;), good 14:27:59 <Tanyap> i don't think so. i'm talking pretty regularly with tony, grace, and chris as it begins to get close. 14:28:10 <graced> Okay, thanks for the update! 14:28:14 <graced> Tanyap++ 14:28:21 <graced> #topic Outreach Committee Report 14:28:25 <graced> kmlussier: you have the floor 14:28:44 <kmlussier> Sorry, you caught me by surprise 14:28:55 <graced> sorry ;) 14:29:12 <kmlussier> I sent along a long-overdue update on how things went at the last ALA conference. 14:29:16 <kmlussier> #link http://list.evergreen-ils.org/pipermail/eg-oversight-board/2016-February/001225.html 14:30:03 <kmlussier> Although we think the booth went well, I don't think the fundraising could justify doing another booth at this time. However, we still think it's important for Evergreen to have a presence at our large, national conferences. 14:30:33 <tspindler> kmlussier: what would be the cost, i forgot what it was 14:30:40 <kmlussier> One way we could do so is by using some meeting room space to organize an Evergreen meeting for both Evergreen users and for those interested in Evergreen. 14:31:06 <kmlussier> The cost is $120 for non-profit organizations. 14:31:11 <kmlussier> Which is a lot less than a booth. 14:31:32 <graced> Also, I think it's better exposure in a way. 14:31:38 <tspindler> I think a room would be a great way. How soon do we ahve to reserve? 14:31:41 <rfrasur> Are there any drawbacks to a meeting? 14:31:59 <graced> Things competing in the same timeslot.. 14:32:07 * rfrasur shrugs 14:32:17 <rfrasur> But there are booths competing in the same exhibit hall, too. 14:32:24 <graced> yup 14:32:43 <kmlussier> tspindler: The deadline is in a couple of months (I'm looking it up.) 14:32:44 <graced> And with the room you get easy to find entries in the scheduler 14:32:53 <kmlussier> But, last year, they closed off submissions for meeting space at one point. 14:32:57 <rfrasur> From my perspective, the meeting room alternative seems better all the way around. 14:33:05 <graced> agreed 14:33:10 <kmlussier> I don't want to risk having it close off again. 14:33:23 <tspindler> I like the idea of a room and agree we just need to be mindful of what else would be in the same time slot 14:33:36 <rfrasur> good point, tspindler 14:33:40 <afterl> I will bring the Evergreen pens 14:33:43 <kmlussier> We did organize an improptu meeting for Midwinter that was very lightly attended. But we didn't do much advanced planning, it wasn't in the scheduler, and it was hosted off-site. 14:34:03 <kmlussier> tspindler: Unfortunately, I don't think we have much control over time slots. 14:34:08 <graced> +1 to advance planning though 14:34:27 <afterl> We did this several years ago and it was well attended 14:34:36 <tspindler> kmlussier: do we ask for a room and ALA gives us a random slot or do we ahve some influence? 14:35:09 <graced> you're at the mercy of ALA, I believe. 14:35:27 <kmlussier> It looks like we can request a meeting time. 14:35:35 * graced is shocked 14:35:44 <kmlussier> But we won't necessarily know when other similar meetings are taking place. 14:35:50 <tspindler> kmlussier: but I assume we don't necessarily know what else may be happening 14:35:51 <afterl> Right 14:35:57 <kmlussier> graced: I said 'request.' I didn't say it would necessarily be granted. 14:36:05 <graced> TBH, there aren't a ton of similar meetings 14:36:13 <rfrasur> Well, kmlussier, what do you need from us? 14:36:16 <graced> kmlussier: fair point 14:36:20 <tspindler> in any case, I think it is a good idea 14:36:25 <kmlussier> rfrasur: Approval to expend the funds. 14:36:28 <rfrasur> k 14:36:49 <graced> Anyone want to make a motion? 14:36:53 <csharp> I make a motion that we do so 14:36:58 * rfrasur seconds 14:36:59 <tspindler> second 14:37:13 <csharp> that is that we approve fund expenditure for an ALA meeting 14:37:16 <graced> Any discussion before we vote? 14:37:39 <rfrasur> I'd just say thanks for finding a good alternative to the booth. 14:37:44 <afterl> Question 14:37:56 <afterl> Who is going to ALA? 14:38:02 <tspindler> I am 14:38:03 <kmlussier> I am 14:38:04 <graced> I am 14:38:11 <afterl> I am 14:38:13 <yboston_> I am not 14:38:15 * rfrasur isn't 14:38:18 <tspindler> Jeanette from C/WMARS also 14:38:27 <afterl> Good 14:38:29 <kmlussier> I've also heard that there are a few people from PINES who are going and willing to help out. 14:38:31 <graced> gmcharlt is ;) 14:38:39 <Tanyap> i'm going. 14:38:42 <gmcharlt> indeed I am :) 14:38:45 * csharp is not one of the PINES folks going ;-) 14:39:21 <graced> So, we have plently of folks to handle a variety of discussions at the meeting. 14:39:34 <graced> afterl: good? 14:39:40 <afterl> Yes, good! 14:39:43 <afterl> And I have the pens! 14:39:57 <graced> #startvote Shall the Board approve an expenditure of $120 for a meeting room at the ALA 2016 Annual Conference in Orlando to be used for outreach purposes? Yes, No, Abstain 14:39:57 <pinesol_green> Begin voting on: Shall the Board approve an expenditure of $120 for a meeting room at the ALA 2016 Annual Conference in Orlando to be used for outreach purposes? Valid vote options are Yes, No, Abstain. 14:39:57 <pinesol_green> Vote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts. 14:39:58 <tspindler> afterl++ 14:40:04 <SHerbertBC> #vote yes 14:40:06 <graced> #vote Yes 14:40:09 <tspindler> #vote Yes 14:40:10 <yboston_> #vote yes 14:40:10 <afterl> #vote yes 14:40:11 <montgoc1> #vote Yes 14:40:34 <rfrasur> #vote yes 14:40:47 <csharp> #vote yes 14:41:00 <graced> #endvote 14:41:00 <pinesol_green> Voted on "Shall the Board approve an expenditure of $120 for a meeting room at the ALA 2016 Annual Conference in Orlando to be used for outreach purposes?" Results are 14:41:00 <pinesol_green> Yes (8): tspindler, afterl, rfrasur, graced, montgoc1, yboston_, csharp, SHerbertBC 14:41:08 <csharp> kmlussier++ 14:41:12 <kmlussier> Thanks everyone! 14:41:15 <afterl> kmlussier++ 14:41:17 <graced> kmlussier++ 14:41:17 <montgoc1> kmlussier++ 14:41:31 <tspindler> kmlussier++ 14:41:37 <graced> moving on 14:41:39 <graced> #topic Site Selection for the 2017 conference 14:41:49 <graced> #info The 2017 Site Selection Committee “met” via email and refined the wording for the 2017 Evergreen Conference selection email. The email was sent to the Evergreen General list on February 5th 14:41:50 <rfrasur> kmlussier++ 14:41:55 <graced> #link http://georgialibraries.markmail.org/thread/pi6y4qpxm4x7wf7g 14:42:07 <graced> Questions about site selection? 14:42:29 <graced> No, we haven't gotten any proposals yet... 14:42:34 <tspindler> Has there been any standard criteria for judging locations? 14:42:54 <graced> http://wiki.evergreen-ils.org/doku.php?id=eg09:conference_nominations 14:43:13 <graced> Those are the judging criteria 14:43:22 <tspindler> What happens if there are no nominations? 14:43:29 <graced> we beg 14:43:44 <tspindler> lol 14:43:44 <rfrasur> I know that the midwest group will be submitting a proposal again. 14:43:49 <graced> huzzah! 14:43:50 <montgoc1> Yes. 14:43:53 <graced> I was hoping they would 14:43:55 <afterl> Very nice! 14:43:59 <csharp> cool 14:44:00 <tspindler> rfrasur++ 14:44:18 <graced> any further questions? 14:44:25 <rfrasur> But, I'm not heading it...just participating. I believe the Joe Knueven is herding the cats. 14:44:49 <graced> moving on then 14:44:52 <graced> #topic EOB elections 14:44:58 <graced> #link http://list.evergreen-ils.org/pipermail/eg-oversight-board/2016-February/001222.html 14:45:06 <graced> There was a lot of info in that email and not all of it needs to be decided at this point. The core of the new member election process stays the same. Any thoughts on (or objections to) putting out the call for nominations on March 4th? 14:45:39 <afterl> No objections from me 14:46:07 <tspindler> The earlier the better 14:46:17 <yboston_> none from me 14:46:17 <montgoc1> Agreed 14:46:20 <csharp> fine here 14:46:26 <rfrasur> I think it's great 14:46:34 <graced> #agreed The call for EOB nominations will go out March 4, 2016 14:46:55 <rfrasur> w00t! 14:47:07 <graced> Do we want to discuss the rest of the email now or ruminate further and discuss via email? 14:47:26 <tspindler> graced: are you refering to selecting officers? 14:47:46 <graced> tspindler: yes, and announcing the new EOB members prior to the conference 14:48:10 <graced> *I* think it warrants more discussion... 14:48:45 <tspindler> If I read the timeline correctly, the election is done before the conference? 14:48:47 <rfrasur> Email discussion or now? 14:48:58 <tspindler> I think it might be good to discuss some now 14:49:00 <graced> rfrasur: either or 14:49:09 <afterl> I'm up for it now 14:49:15 <montgoc1> Now is fine. 14:49:15 <rfrasur> tspindler, that was my understanding. 14:49:32 <rfrasur> About the election being before the conference. 14:49:55 <afterl> So what's the potential downside of doing the election before? 14:49:56 <graced> tspindler: if we could get the elections done prior to the conference we could do officer elections prior to the conference which would (hopefully) allow us to discuss more weighty topics at the conference meeting? 14:50:11 <yboston_> +1 14:50:26 <tspindler> graced: thanks and I think it is a good idea to get this all done before the conference 14:50:42 <tspindler> that is, have the election and officers selected 14:50:43 <rfrasur> afterl: the only downside I could think of would be that there might be some attendees to the conference who aren't on listservs and might not even know about the elections. 14:51:00 <montgoc1> Since the board only meets face to face once a year, it would be nice to use the time for bigger topics. 14:51:03 <csharp> so if we do elections beforehand, would those of us rolling off the committee still be a part of the meeting at the conference? 14:51:24 <graced> The bylaws are clear that turnover doesn't happen until after the conference is over 14:51:25 <tspindler> csharp: i think they should be to transition new people 14:51:35 <csharp> graced: ah - okay 14:51:38 <rfrasur> csharp, I believe the terms would still extend until the end of the in face meeting 14:51:44 <graced> You keep your seat until the end of the conference. 14:51:49 <csharp> got it 14:51:58 <afterl> Allows for a smooth transition 14:52:06 <graced> So, while we ask new members to attend the meeting they are non voting ... if I recall correctly 14:52:15 * rfrasur was almost right but not right. 14:52:20 <rfrasur> Yeah, that's right, graced 14:53:13 <graced> Okay, well if we're all in agreement we have to write up some new language to vote on 14:53:20 <graced> Which I didn't do 14:53:40 <graced> So, I'll send a proposal for new language and send it via email 14:53:48 <rfrasur> and then email vote? 14:53:49 <tspindler> graced++ 14:53:54 <afterl> graced++ 14:53:55 <montgoc1> graced++ 14:54:06 <SHerbertBC> graced++ 14:54:09 <graced> #action graced to propose new language for EOB election process 14:54:24 <graced> speaking of the election process itself... Can I get a few volunteers to help with the election process? 14:54:33 <afterl> Sure, I'll help 14:54:36 <SHerbertBC> graced: happy to 14:54:37 * rfrasur will help with that. Tell me what to do 14:54:48 <graced> okay, fabulous 14:55:31 <graced> #info rfrasur, afterl, and SHerbertBC volunteered to assist with the election process 14:55:52 <graced> I'll send an email to y'all tomorrow. 14:56:00 <afterl> Okay, great! 14:56:03 <rfrasur> awesome 14:56:05 <rfrasur> ! 14:56:10 <graced> it's almost as easy as the site selection committee 14:56:22 <afterl> Sweet! 14:56:23 <rfrasur> uh.... 14:56:36 <rfrasur> I've got not context. Rock on. 14:56:38 <graced> We’re running a little short on time… 14:56:51 <graced> But we should quickly touch base on Outreachy 14:56:56 <graced> #topic Outreachy participation 14:57:01 <graced> #link http://list.evergreen-ils.org/pipermail/eg-oversight-board/2016-February/001209.html 14:57:12 <graced> With the date for Outreachy so close (deadline in 4 weeks), should we decline this round? 14:57:21 <rfrasur> Yes 14:57:52 <graced> I was hoping yboston_ would be available for this part... 14:58:03 <graced> I know he had some thoughts about DIG 14:58:04 * rfrasur agrees. 14:58:25 <kmlussier> Question from the audience? 14:58:25 <yboston_> I am here, but will be ask to start a presentation ay moment from now :( 14:58:30 <yboston_> *asked 14:58:43 <graced> yboston_: Should we pick this up via email then? 14:58:47 <yboston_> sure 14:59:00 <graced> sounds good 14:59:03 <kmlussier> Do we know what the cost is to participate in Outreachy this year? 14:59:13 <rfrasur> While we wait, hopefully, I will say that while I'm a "yes" right now, if at all possible at the conference, or via email, I think we should start hashing this out so that next round, we can participate. 14:59:32 <graced> kmlussier: I don't think that was in the email... 14:59:56 <graced> But we should ask. 15:00:05 <graced> Thanks! 15:00:20 <graced> csharp: can you find that out? 15:00:23 <kmlussier> Actually, I just found it. 15:00:27 <kmlussier> $6,500 15:00:30 <graced> well... never mind. 15:00:33 <kmlussier> https://wiki.gnome.org/Outreachy/Admin/InfoForOrgs 15:00:36 <graced> kmlussier++ 15:00:38 <yboston_> wow 15:00:42 <graced> ouch 15:00:58 <csharp> 65https://wiki.gnome.org/Outreachy/Admin/InfoForOrgs#Action 15:01:05 <csharp> oops 15:01:19 <csharp> kmlussier beat me (and I have some extra characters 15:01:19 <graced> Okay, armed with that info, we'll ove that discussion to the email list. 15:01:26 <graced> *move 15:01:43 <graced> It's probably a "no" for this round but we will discuss. 15:01:51 <afterl> Okay 15:02:09 <graced> #action discuss Outreachy participation in more detail via email. 15:02:27 <graced> Oh, I almost forgot. 15:02:28 <graced> #info The conference EOB meeting is scheduled for lunch on Thursday 4/21 12:30-1:15 ET 15:02:51 <graced> If you can't attend in person, please let me know ad we'll see how we can loop you in via technology. 15:03:13 <graced> if there's no other new business...? 15:03:37 <rfrasur> not from this particular corner of the heartland. 15:03:44 <tspindler> none here 15:03:56 * graced can't believe we made it through that beast of an agenda 15:04:04 <afterl> graced++ 15:04:09 <graced> Okay then, thanks everyone! 15:04:10 <csharp> graced++ # wranglin' 15:04:10 <SHerbertBC> graced++ 15:04:15 <montgoc1> graced++ 15:04:15 <graced> #endmeeting